<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 90-9-1 rule</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mark.dreamtime.org/blog/2006/10/90-9-1-rule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mark.dreamtime.org/blog/2006/10/90-9-1-rule/</link>
	<description>climbs rocks. moves mountains</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:23:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark Beveridge &#187; Twitter</title>
		<link>http://mark.dreamtime.org/blog/2006/10/90-9-1-rule/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Beveridge &#187; Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 15:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mark.dreamtime.org/blog/2006/10/90-9-1-rule/#comment-95</guid>
		<description>[...] Displaying public conversations on a webpage attracts people (see: Jakob Nielsen&#8217;s 90-9-1 rule), even if they don&#8217;t post, or belong to groups; and it keeps a history (public or private). The website is the heart of the application. But posting is shown to be easy, because it&#8217;s short and doesn&#8217;t NEED to say anything clever, and so the initial hurdle is low (but the reason to continue is usually your group). Group-forming is easy and Reed&#8217;s Law says it has the potential to add huge value to a network (so should Twitter encourage it more, by adding an option to post to sub-groups of your contacts?); and a reluctance to allow it is one of many reasons given for Friendster surrendering its lead. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Displaying public conversations on a webpage attracts people (see: Jakob Nielsen&#8217;s 90-9-1 rule), even if they don&#8217;t post, or belong to groups; and it keeps a history (public or private). The website is the heart of the application. But posting is shown to be easy, because it&#8217;s short and doesn&#8217;t NEED to say anything clever, and so the initial hurdle is low (but the reason to continue is usually your group). Group-forming is easy and Reed&#8217;s Law says it has the potential to add huge value to a network (so should Twitter encourage it more, by adding an option to post to sub-groups of your contacts?); and a reluctance to allow it is one of many reasons given for Friendster surrendering its lead. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
